 |
Reviews by Mike Hertenstein | www.flickerings.com |
| |
|
| |
| "Know Thyself" and "Nothing in Excess" phrases
carved in stone at the ancient cradle of European civilization. This
documentary leverages the more recent and ongoing European identity crisis in
a literal effort to find locate the Golden Mean, what we might call here
"Middle America," in the geographical center of Europe. What makes this
quest worth making is the fact that there are so many claimants to the
geographical center, and apparently more popping up all the time. The
gameplan here involves traveling to each of these aspirants a circle
of centers, in Germany, Austria, Poland, Slovakia and Lithuania where
we find monuments, markers, cafes, and local authorities confidently marking
the spot. Along the way, we sample various local cultures represented by
each of these centers and reflect a little on the diversity and prospects for
unity in a Europe whose borders have always been fluid, and never moreso than
at the present. Stops include a countercultural gathering of tribes in a
forest in Western Germany, the Austrian berg Braunau (where the main snag to
promoting local tourism is being the birthplace of Adolf Hitler!); two towns
basing claims of centrality on Divine authority: one in Slovokia (an angel)
and Poland (the Pope); and various other claimants, new and old. In one
place, the film crew actually records the building of new center marker, in
another, hundreds of kilometers away, they find a hole in the ground from
which the marker has been stolen. Bopping between colorful locales, the film
feels like a Sunday afternoon drive in the countryside; unfortunately, the
roadtrip breaks down a bit in you guessed it, the middle. The
filmmakers tend to get bogged down in scenes that might have played better
shorter, and might have contributed more if they'd found a way to deeper
sorts of center-searching. For example, the film suggests at one point
possible metaphorical centers of the Europe in television and the cross, with
the former sequence going on too long and the latter to quick and
superficial. Class, economic, and ideological divisions are touched on, but
only on the surface; by the end, one feels we've been skirting something deep
and profound but never as far into the center as we might have. It was a
great idea, and much of the film is great fun, but I'm not sure the
filmmakers either realized fully what they were on to or were up to the task
of following the clues beyond playing along the edges.
 |
|
| |
| By late 1980s, glasnost had unleashed a flood of films
exposing horrors long-hidden in the Soviet history and psyche. After more
than half-century under a strictly-controlled Official Reality, a
truth-starved people gave in to what became a feeding frenzy in a
suddenly-free market. Demand for exposure soon produced its own genre,
cherukha (Russian slang for "darkness") films. Technically, Come
and See might not be classed as a cherukha film, since the Soviets never
had any reticence about exposing Nazi atrocities. Yet this film is far from
yet another romantic triumph of the People over the Fascists, and was relased
amid the first pent-up burst of truth-telling about Soviet crimes. The year
before, in 1984, the anti-Stalinist allegory Repentance was made (though not
released immediately), launching a decade-long unbelievably painful national
self-examination. Like Apocalypse Now, Come and See journeys
into the heart of human darkness, in a surreal and soul-wrenching combination
of art and horror that threatens to call into question the entire human
endeavor yet not entirely bereft of hope.
In 1943, the invading German army was cutting a barbarian swath across the
Western USSR, especially in Byelorussia, a region particularly subjected to
staggering brutality by the Nazis, who left a path of slaughter and pillage
in their wake. Teenage Floyra is determined to join the Soviet insurgents
fighting off the invader. After a painful parting with his mother and
sisters, Floyra gets stuck with the job of holding the fort while the rest of
the partisans move on, leaving him behind to witness things that steal both
his innocence and reason. This story is a coming-of-age that becomes a
descent into madness. "Are you crazy?" is the opening line of the film, and
not the last time the question is asked. As with recent Balkan movies, this
film reveals a deeply-wounded national psyche, post-traumatic stress as
experienced by entire populations.
American cinema has probed its own war-woundedness, but never like this, and
chiefly because America has never experienced war like this. Come and
See delivers unforgettable image after image, from the surreal to the
lyrical, and is paced so that the effect of both extremes are maximized: an
interlude of joy in a rainy forest, wading neck-deep through a muddy swamp in
search of refugees, a mad exodus through razed and burning villages. The
directorial choices are more than just framing up compellling shots, however:
the strategy seems to be aimed at getting us inside Floyra's
experience as much as possible. The film is filled with disturbing and
distorted images, including frequent use of closeups in which the subject
looks into the camera lens. Another key to the astonishing power of this
film is one of the most brilliant sound effects/music mixes you'll
ever hear: bone-jarring synthesized tones just at the edge of audibility,
layered over Psycho-like screetches, distorted crowd sounds, snatches
of classical music, and strategic silences. The net result: we feel with
Florya, the fraternal thrill of the partisan camp, the horror of his
experience press into our minds, like his, like hammer in the skull.
The effect is devastating, yet transcends atrocity-porn, the falsity of
sanctimonious Hollywood war blockbusters, or even well-meaning anti-war
message-making; if the human experience includes this possibility, it seems
important that being human requires confronting this and, hopefully, coming
out the other side without losing mind or hope. The final sequence is
breathtakingly cathartic, and the hope comes in raising the question of
whether terrible deeds can ever be effaced without resorting to perpetuating
or even escalating the cycle of violence.  |
|
| |
| Last year was hailed the "Year of the Documentary"
after a bumper crop of "non-fiction films" though some will resist the
use of that label for all documentaries. Indeed, "non-fiction" films
connected with controversial topics may in the end serve only to have
devalued substantially the notion of "non-fiction". One happy result of such
devaluation might be increased public skepticism toward other alleged
"non-fiction": television news, corporate-funded "studies," government press
releases, etc. Ordinary consumers of media may finally be coming to
understand, after all, that "Nothing is unmediated." But even with this in
mind, most viewers of this DV documentary from Israel will agree that it
presents about as unmediated a look at its controversial subject as one might
get. (Even the titles are stripped down, looking like they were created on an
Apple II!)
The subject here is those Israeli security checkpoints along the Palestinian
border, a border which these days seems to mark the virtual center of the
universe, a painful everyday reality for everyone involved especially
Palestinians who find themselves on either side of the line. There are, no
doubt, plenty of stories of both violent collisions and life-affirming
cross-cultural engagements at these checkpoints. However, this film eschews
the sensational extremes, and focuses on the everyday nuisance and
frustration these borders mark for all involved. For the soldiers: it's a
dirty job that somebody has to do, with those damnable combinations of
boredom and danger, bureaucratic numbness and absolute power. For the
Palestinians: it's a daily inconvenience and humiliation, provoking an
equally damnable combination of bitter resignation and hidden rage.
We get a sense of the endless ordinariness of it all because the basic
scenario is repeated with predictable variations. Stop your vehicle.
Exit your vehicle. Empty your luggage by the side of the road. Along
with personal effects, border crossings involve exposing personal history,
plans, detailed answers to endless questions at the discretion of bored and
cocky teenage guards. Thus we meet ordinary people trying to get on with
their ordinary lives. Going home. Going to work. Going to a funeral.
Visiting a sick father. Doing last-minute errands before a wedding (though
it's tough to see how anything can be "last minute" with such potential
delays and complications must necessarily be factored into any plans). Taking
a sick child to a doctor. In fact, even Palestinian ambulances are stopped
and emptied: a doctor is shown patiently explaining to the young border guard
which patient has what disease and is going to which hospital. Often it's
not enough simply to explain what you're doing, you have to
convince the young man with the Uzi that you're telling the truth,
that your need is important enough for him to let you past. And one is
always painfully cognizant of being at the mercy of so many unpredictable
circumstances: the guard's mood that day, ever-changing policies, arbitrary
restrictions. A road that was open this morning is now suddenly closed. A
guard who told you one thing is now telling you another. The bus that drives
children through here to school each morning suddenly doesn't have the right
permit. And, as with bad parenting, everything given as absolute is quite
often actually negotiable, and everybody knows it. There's always a
possibility that if you press hard enough, the guard will let you by: these
are ingredients to make an already-volatile situation even more dangerous.
Tempers flare, babies cry, mothers wail, guards get nasty.
The viewer will be surprised at the access these filmmakers were accorded.
Clearly, they must have been "embedded" in some way or another, working with
the cooperation of the Israeli military who have been known to be
skittish about unfavorable press in battle zones. Perhaps the reason
elements unflattering to the Israelis passed any official filters is because
the situations recorded are as ordinary as the day is long, just another day
on the border. Soldiers are, after all, only human: they're shown relaxing
off duty, flirting with pretty girls, working under difficult conditions. But
even nice guys in repetitive jobs grow numb and irritable, begin to treat the
customers as faceless masses. Along with any nice guys, there are a few
stereotypically swaggering jerks, who refer to the Palestinians as "animals."
(Which, not to put too fine a point on it, takes us from bureaucratic
numbness into the direction of Nazi sentiment.)
Some soldiers, in fact, have refused to do this dirty job and we are
shown one guard reading (with some disgust) a statement to that effect by the
so-called Refusniks, Israeli military personal who are
conscientiously-objecting to participating in ill-treatment of the
Palestinians people.
And despite the racist attitude of some, the Palestinians are people, too.
We see them chafe at the restrictions, get upset and angry, standing in the
rain and snow for hours waiting to get home or all the other places they're
needed or need to be but more often they stand with a seemingly
infinite, if bone-weary, patience. Not really infinite patience, of course:
we see it in the eyes of older men who have mastered the terrible art of not
causing offense while defiantly holding on to dignity, and recording
everything for bitter memory. We see it in the eyes of children, not yet so
practiced in such subtleties, watching as their parents and grandparents are
harrassed, humiliated and harrangued, accused of lying, treated as children,
as idiots, and yes, as animals. The images those little eyes are taking in
will haunt the coming generations like the memory of meek Jews obediently
entering gas chambers fueled countless vows of "Never again."
You can be certain that some will complain that the relatively unmediated
presentation of this incredible little DV film leaves out some important
context, namely the terrible violence against the Israeli citizens that has
provoked such oppressive caution. On the other hand, this film goes a long
way to providing context for understanding why little Palestinian
children grow up to kill Israelis. Meanwhile, there's no question that next
time I hear that the US army in Iraq has "increased the number of
checkpoints" that I'll have a better sense of what that might mean. |
| |
|